Thread:~Mana~/@comment-4068482-20131015233137/@comment-3011091-20131016224344

Your block wasn't for following the NPOV Policy, it was for refusal to replace the content with that of a neutral point of view. Even as a reader, I'd rather read something that was one-sided but also contained factual information than visit an article that was completely empty except for some headers.

And while you consider it bias, have you looked at the metagame at all recently? Fine, the content is borderline opinion, but us saying "Storm is outclassed by Galaxy and Cosmic" is based on hard research with benchmark tests. That is what our users like to read; something that helps them be competitive.

Fine, to please you, we'll work on updating the articles to feature a neutral point of view, but you must work on actually reading what I write. Your block was based on removal of content and refusal to replace it with something that actually was a neutral point of view, not because you were following guidelines.

So please, maintain a negative opinion on the Wiki in general, but it was your own inability to read what I wrote that led to the ban, not my ignorance towards the topic. And don't criticise the work of the community when, based on your editing statistics globally across Wikia, you don't even have 100 mainspace edits.

Now I bid you farewell. Do as you please but I believe I've justified myself. Yes, you have a point with the Neutral Point of View guidelines. No, you did not take the right approach to it. No, you aren't capable of reading my posts properly. And no, don't criticise the Wiki if you don't actually contribute actively to any Wiki anyway.